By Twink Jones Gadama
In response to the recent article discussing the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) refusal to utilize national identification cards for the upcoming general elections, it is important to provide a balanced perspective on this matter.
While some may perceive this decision negatively, it is crucial to consider the potential reasoning behind the DPP’s stance.
Firstly, it is essential to acknowledge that political parties often employ various strategies to secure electoral success.
The DPP’s decision not to rely solely on national IDs may stem from a desire to ensure a fair and transparent electoral process.
By exploring alternative methods of voter identification, the DPP aims to minimize the risk of potential irregularities and fraud.
Moreover, the DPP’s concern about the inclusion of ghost voters from foreign nations is a valid one.
The party’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of the electoral system is commendable.
By implementing additional measures to verify the legitimacy of voters, the DPP aims to safeguard the democratic principles that underpin the electoral process.
Additionally, it is worth noting that the DPP’s use of national identification cards during their own convention indicates their recognition of the importance of accurate voter identification.
This further emphasizes their commitment to ensuring a fair and transparent democratic process.
By setting a precedent within their own party, the DPP demonstrates their willingness to adhere to the principles they advocate.
Furthermore, the assertion that the DPP’s decision to refuse national IDs is solely driven by a lack of popular support or a result of internal splits is speculative.
It is essential to consider that political parties make strategic decisions based on multiple factors, including public sentiment, party dynamics, and electoral strategies.
As an opposition party, the DPP may be exploring alternative avenues to engage with voters and regain support.
It is crucial to approach this issue objectively and consider the potential reasoning behind the DPP’s decision.
Their refusal to use national identification cards for the upcoming elections may be a strategic approach aimed at ensuring a fair and transparent electoral process.
By implementing additional measures to verify voter legitimacy, the DPP aims to protect the integrity of the democratic system.
It is important to remember that political parties employ various strategies to secure electoral success, and the DPP’s decision should be viewed within this context.
The MCP led government is using NRB in its quest to rig the votes.
NRB managed to register millions of people in the central region which is perceived as MCP strong hold and failed to register potential voters in both the north and south which are the base for opposition.
This deliberate move is an act of rigging and DPP, with eagle eyes, observed the desperate MCP’s plans to rig the votes, which is why they oppose the use of national IDs in the 2025 elections.
The DPP’s opposition to national IDs is rooted in concerns about fairness, transparency, and potential manipulation of the electoral process.
They argue that relying on national IDs could disenfranchise many eligible voters who haven’t been registered by the NRB.
All that DPP wants is to see eligible voters given their rights to vote in next year’s elections.
MCP is aware that it will lose in next year’s elections and the party gurus are applying all arsenals that will make them cling to power but time is over for them.
