By Burnett Munthali
In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court has rejected the Attorney General’s appeal against the nullification of Charles Kalumo’s appointment as Director General of the Department of Immigration. The Attorney General had sought a stay on the lower court’s decision pending a full hearing. This decision upholds the earlier ruling that invalidated Kalumo’s appointment, citing procedural irregularities and non-compliance with the stipulated appointment processes.
The case highlights critical issues regarding administrative appointments and adherence to legal protocols within government departments. The Supreme Court’s refusal to grant a stay underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring that proper procedures are followed in such appointments.
This ruling is expected to have broader implications for similar cases and may prompt a review of appointment processes within various government agencies to ensure compliance with legal standards.
